A Wealth Manager’s Insight into the Choice Paradox

You can also access this podcast on iono.fm here.

CIARAN RYAN: Clients frequently express to wealth managers: ‘We wish to invest in alternative assets for enhanced portfolio returns, but we also seek stability,’ reflecting a preference for established investment options.

This creates a challenge between adopting innovative technology and preserving a personalized approach. Key decisions revolve around whether to focus on high-growth technologies or stable dividend stocks, along with navigating global strategies in compliance with South Africa’s regulations. Striking the right balance between risk and reward is increasingly complicated.

Joining us once more is Adriaan Pask, Chief Investment Officer at PSG Wealth. Welcome back, Adriaan! Can you elucidate this paradox of choice I’ve referred to?

ADRIAAN PASK: The financial industry is experiencing rapid advancements globally, resulting in heightened competition among providers and an expanding array of product offerings.

This competitive landscape has produced many geared products for investors, but not all deliver true value to clients.

The fundamental question remains: is a larger selection of products genuinely beneficial? Does it add complexity, or is there a point where additional options decrease marginal utility?

CIARAN RYAN: Clearly, having an extensive range of choices does not assure improved results, and not all investment options suit every investor.

Can you help clarify when having more choices is advantageous and when it leads to confusion?

ADRIAAN PASK: This paradox extends broadly, even to sectors like retail and FMCG.

While numerous options can be beneficial, too many can result in confusion.

The effect varies according to the product and its goals, as well as the investor’s actual needs. A plethora of options can make finding the optimal choice feel like searching for a needle in a haystack.

Furthermore, with increasing competition, providers are probing the boundaries of risk appetite. Are more products becoming inherently riskier? We’ve previously discussed SPACs and cryptocurrencies, and I question their ability to meet client expectations effectively.

CIARAN RYAN: It appears there are many intricate products available, and with capital flooding the markets, risk appetites rise. How does this influence long-term planning for investors?

ADRIAAN PASK: Indeed, your observation is correct; loose financial conditions paired with excess capital complicate the process of long-term planning. By nature, planning should emphasize long-term perspectives.

How do you resist the temptation of short-term gains that contrast with your long-term objectives?

Our strategy emphasizes dependable assets that provide a degree of certainty, which may not always be the safest within their asset classes. Traditional asset classes like equities tend to exhibit greater reliability compared to newer entities like cryptocurrencies.

CIARAN RYAN: At PSG, navigating this complex investment environment must pose significant challenges. How do you stay true to your investment philosophy?

ADRIAAN PASK: We place greater emphasis on the investment strategy than on the individual products. The strategy helps pinpoint needs and establish clear goals for clients.

Our objective isn’t simply to offer a wide array of products.

We aim to utilize products to enrich the advisory process rather than allow them to overshadow it. Given the critical nature of reliability, every product must effectively support the success of the strategy.

For example, if a client seeks an inflation-plus-3% return, it’s essential that we identify consistent products capable of achieving that over time. Failing to do so could adversely affect the client’s financial plan.

Therefore, aligning objectives with reliable products is essential.

As new products emerge, clients may be influenced by aggressive marketing. Social media can amplify trends, but yielding to these temptations could compromise goal attainment.

Consequently, we make it a priority to ensure that the elements of the investment strategy are trustworthy, minimizing the chances of shortfalls.

In contrast, considering the future of something like Bitcoin introduces uncertainty regarding its alignment with a client’s plan and long-term goals—something we can assert more confidently with inflation-plus-3% strategies.

We rigorously assess our products and collaborate with our actuarial team to confirm they meet established goals.

CIARAN RYAN: There is inherent forecasting risk in managing a diverse range of products. How do you navigate that?

ADRIAAN PASK: Precisely. Investments are often evaluated on a risk spectrum, where equities are perceived as the most volatile asset class. Yet, equities consistently yield long-term returns of inflation plus 6% or 7%, functioning within a more constrained range over suitable holding periods.

This shift in perspective transforms the advisor’s role into one of ensuring clients remain on course, which is paramount. Relying on highly unpredictable assets like cryptocurrencies complicates planning and introduces uncertainty in predicted outcomes.

Actuaries encounter similar forecasting challenges when making predictions for large organizations.

Our approach to financial planning mirrors actuarial strategies, underscoring high confidence while still incorporating growth assets. Certain products cannot be justified due to excessive forecasting risks.

CIARAN RYAN: For individuals collaborating with wealth managers, what strategies can they adopt to ensure their plans align with their needs in the midst of so many available options?

ADRIAAN PASK: This can indeed be intricate. Regulations necessitate at least an annual client review to confirm that they are on track. Nonetheless, this timeframe often feels inadequate, especially for long-term assets like equities.

Clients should engage proactively with their financial planner—ideally at the plan’s outset—by asking, ‘How confident are we that this combination of assets or products will achieve my objectives? Can you provide evidence of this?’ This approach reassures clients that they are investing in a plan rather than merely products.

Clients deserve to verify that the securities or products chosen have a history of reliability. They should feel empowered to seek evidence supporting their investment strategy. Adhering to the plan and thinking long term will yield benefits. I’m here to support you on this journey.

I find it concerning when I hear about untested products being utilized in client portfolios.

For instance, if a client questions the rationale behind a 5% allocation to cryptocurrencies, it’s challenging to see how any advisor could credibly justify that without prior evaluations.

When we integrate something into a plan, it’s based on reliability and proven performance, which not only enhances client comfort but also strengthens the advisory process, increasing the likelihood of achieving goals.

Frequently, advisors might cater to clients’ interest in particular asset classes, such as cryptocurrency, instead of adhering to their core responsibilities.

A client seeks a strategy that provides peace of mind and reliability. If introducing a high-risk asset jeopardizes long-term aspirations due to insufficient dialogue, it reflects poorly on the financial planner, not the client.

Ultimately, clients must feel confident that they possess a robust plan supported by dependable products or asset classes, ensuring they remain on the right track.

CIARAN RYAN: Thank you, Adriaan Pask, Chief Investment Officer at PSG Wealth. This conversation has illuminated the factors influencing wealth managers’ decisions and their navigation through today’s complex product landscape.

Thank you once again for sharing your insights, Adriaan.

ADRIAAN PASK: Thank you, Ciaran, and to all our listeners. I hope you find this information helpful. Given the complexities, let’s strive to simplify them.

Brought to you by PSG Wealth.

Moneyweb does not endorse any product or service advertised in sponsored articles on our platform.